Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Us News

Mark Meadows’ Legal Tangle: Appeals Court Rejects Transfer Bid

Appeals Panel Rejects Meadows's Reques
Mark Meadows

Mark Meadows as Federal Appeals Court Blocks Jurisdiction Move (Photo: CNN)

Mark Meadows as Federal Appeals Court Blocks Jurisdiction Move

A new development in the ongoing court battle over the 2020 presidential election is a major setback for Mark Meadows, who used to be Trump’s chief of staff. A federal appeals court in Georgia made a big decision when it said no to Meadows’s request to move his Fulton County election influence case to federal court. It upheld the decision of a lower court to keep the case in state court. The appeals court’s decision made it clear that Meadows’ efforts to change the case’s jurisdiction were not successful because the alleged events that led to the criminal action had nothing to do with his job.

And even if Meadows was an “officer,” the decision made it clear that his alleged part in a plot to overturn an election was not related to his job duties. In this case, it was clear that Meadows’s request to move the case under a law that gets rid of criminal proceedings for acts done “under color” of office as a federal official was turned down.

It also made it clear that the law in question does not apply to former federal officers, which ended Meadows’ legal maneuvering.

READ ALSO: New York’s Third District Special Election: A Historic Showdown Unfolds

This setback in the legal system comes after Meadows, former President Donald Trump, and 17 others pleaded not guilty in August to all charges in a large racketeering case that said they tried to change the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. As the case went on, more and more suspects, like Kenneth Chesebro, Sidney Powell, Jena Ellis, and Scott Hall, agreed to plead guilty in exchange for agreeing to testify against other defendants.

It’s important to remember that the former president has strongly denied that the case is political, which has made the whole court process more difficult and contentious. The decision is an important part of the ongoing court battles that followed the controversial 2020 presidential election. It has big effects on the people involved as well as on politics in general.

READ ALSO: Wisconsin Senate Majority Leader Stands Firm On Appointment Of Fake Elector To State Elections Commission

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Crime

A convicted felon in California was arrested after he tortured and hostage two women and staged it as burglary. Convicted Felon Tortured and Kidnapped...

Finance

The application for the program, Rise Up Cambridge, in Massachusetts will begin on June 1 and will end on July 31 and qualified residents...

Crime

Police authorities arrested a man in Oklahoma after he was accused of raping and killing his 18-year-old graduate who was about to graduate from...

Us News

News from Springfield, Illinois is that a bill that would require public restrooms in Illinois to be available to both genders is coming under...