Photo from Google
Governor’s Firm Stand
In a written statement, Governor Pillen reaffirmed Nebraska’s decision to opt out of the Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children (Summer EBT) program, citing the end of the pandemic as the rationale behind declining federal aid.
Pillen’s announcement stirred outrage after defending the move, remarking, “I don’t believe in welfare.” Critics lambasted the decision, arguing that the $18 million aid could benefit approximately 175,000 food-insecure children in Nebraska during summer breaks.
Despite the program’s estimated administrative cost of $300,000 for Nebraska, advocates emphasized its substantial benefits and petitioned the state to utilize the federal initiative, stressing the dire need, especially amid rising inflation and strained household incomes.
Advocacy and Community Backlash
Nebraska Appleseed led the charge, delivering a petition with over 6,100 signatures from 230 communities, highlighting the necessity of the Summer EBT program. Testimonies outlined the struggles of families and the critical role the aid would play in easing financial burdens.
Governor Pillen defended the state’s alternative through the Summer Food Service Program but faced criticism over its accessibility, particularly in rural areas. Critics highlighted the potential limitations of on-site programs, leaving out families in remote locations.
Community advocates like Jenni Benson from the Nebraska State Education Association questioned the governor’s decision, emphasizing the undeniable right of children to access adequate food, while Preston Love Jr. suggested Pillen’s actions might be more politically driven than compassionate.
READ ALSO:Â Year-End Stimulus: Unveiling The December Payments Set To Roll Out In The Final Week
