The New Hampshire House of Representatives voted on a proposed secession clause linked to the national debt. Find out more about the rejection and the implications it holds.
New Hampshire House of Representatives Proposed Secession Amendment Fails to Garner Support
In the news report published by the Washington Times, it is said that the New Hampshire House of Representatives recently made a decisive decision to reject the proposed secession clause tied to the national debt, avoiding a potentially controversial constitutional amendment. Lawmakers dismissed not only the amendment itself but also a bill aimed at studying the broader implications of New Hampshire breaking away from the United States. Without engaging in debate, the House dealt a resounding blow to the proposed constitutional amendment, which sought to mandate the state’s transition to a sovereign nation if the national debt were to reach $40 trillion.
The proposed legislation also sought to establish a committee responsible for studying the economic, legal, and sociological aspects of New Hampshire exerting its sovereign state rights. This move was reminiscent of a failed attempt two years prior, where a similar proposal advocating state secession was met with overwhelming opposition. New Hampshire legislators were uncompromising in their stance against secession, especially when considering the significant obstacles required for changing the state constitution.
READ ALSO: Trump Vows To Halt U.S. Steel Sale To Japanese Corporation If Elected President
This rejection mirrors failed secession efforts in other states, including Mississippi and South Carolina. Interestingly, the sponsor of the latest New Hampshire amendment, Rep. Jason Gerhard, attempted to align himself with secessionists in Texas. Despite such affiliations and efforts, the idea of secession remains on the fringe, as evidenced by the lack of traction these movements have gained in other states.
The rejection of the proposed secession clause showcases the resolve of the New Hampshire Legislature to preserve the state’s ties to the United States. It also serves as a reminder of the stringent requirements for amending the state constitution. Ultimately, this decisive action reflects the steadfast commitment of the New Hampshire House of Representatives to maintaining the state’s status within the union.